Compare

Compared, honestly.

How Siteshare relates to the tools you might use instead or alongside: Git-based and headless CMSs, AI editors, and AI site builders. Facts with sources, and when the other choice is the better one.

Next to the CMS your client knows

Siteshare next to WordPress, Contentful, Webflow and Framer
QuestionSiteshareWordPressContentfulWebflowFramer
How your client editsChats, points at it or types on the pageAdmin screens and the block editorForms in the Contentful web appAn editor on the page, for text and CMS itemsEditing on the page and CMS forms
Set up before the client can startNothing: your code is the content modelA theme, post types and fieldsContent types, wired into your codeCMS collectionsCMS collections
A site you built with AI, in your own codeYes: any Node or plain HTML siteNo: a PHP themeYes, once you connect itNo: you build it in WebflowNo: you build it in Framer
Where the site livesYour repository and your own hostA PHP host with a databaseThe content at Contentful, the site on your hostOn WebflowOn Framer
What keeps the client from breaking itFour levels per client, approval above that, and a clean build before anything goes liveRoles per userRoles and field validationsEditors change content, not the designRoles for collaborators

As of October 2026, from each product's own site: WordPress, Contentful, Webflow, Framer. More in Compare.

What it costs you, next to the tools for builders

A month, excl. VATHow it counts5 client sites20 client sites
SitesharePer site, less as you grow; clients and builders unlimited$36$126
ZeroAgency program: $19 per client site$95$380
TinaCMSPer project; Team $24 a month$120$480
CloudCannonPer user, sites unlimited: Standard $55 with 3 users, Team $350 with 15, $10 per extra user$85$410
CMS ChatPer client account: Studio €499 for up to 10€499Not listed

Each client counted as one person who edits, plus you. Prices from each tool's own pricing page: Zero (November 1, 2026), TinaCMS (October 23, 2026), CloudCannon (October 28, 2026), CMS Chat (October 27, 2026). They change; check before you decide.

One by one

Git-based CMS

Siteshare vs TinaCMS

TinaCMS gives editors forms and click-to-field editing on a schema you define. Siteshare lets clients change any part of the site by talking, with no schema.

Git-based CMS

Siteshare vs Decap CMS

Decap CMS is a free, open-source form editor on fields you configure. Siteshare lets clients change the real site by talking or pointing, without a config.

Git-based CMS

Siteshare vs Pages CMS

Pages CMS is a free, open-source editor for content you describe in .pages.yml. Siteshare edits the site as your AI built it, nothing to describe.

Hosted Git-based CMS

Siteshare vs Decap Turbo

Decap Turbo hosts the open-source Decap CMS: auth, users and speed, priced per site and per seat. Siteshare counts only sites and needs no fields.

Git-based CMS

Siteshare vs CloudCannon

CloudCannon gives editors visual editing on regions you mark up and config you write, priced per user. Siteshare edits the site as built, priced per site.

Headless CMS

Siteshare vs Sanity

Sanity is a content platform with Studio, visual editing and AI for builds on its APIs. Siteshare adds an editor to the site you have, content stays in Git.

Headless CMS

Siteshare vs Storyblok

Storyblok is a headless CMS with a visual editor: content in its cloud, blocks you define, an SDK in your code. Siteshare edits the code of the site you built.

Open-source headless CMS

Siteshare vs Payload

Payload is an open-source CMS and Next.js framework: collections in code, an admin panel, content in your database. Siteshare edits the site as you built it.

Host with AI agents

Siteshare vs Netlify

Netlify Agent Runners lets team members prompt an AI agent to change a Netlify site. Siteshare gives clients an editor at their own site, on any host.

AI editor

Siteshare vs CMS Brew

Both let clients edit a site in Git by chatting, at the same price. CMS Brew keeps them to content values; Siteshare goes further, with your approval.

AI editor

Siteshare vs CMS Chat

CMS Chat and Siteshare both let clients edit a site in Git by chatting. The differences: drafts and a build check, selecting and drawing, and a free plan.

AI website platform

Siteshare vs Fimo

Fimo is a platform for AI-built sites with hosting, a content layer and AI agents. Siteshare adds an editor to the site you built and leaves hosting to you.

AI site builder

Siteshare vs Lovable

Lovable builds apps and sites from a prompt. To let a client change one, they join your workspace and use your credits. Siteshare gives them their own editor.

AI site builder

Siteshare vs v0

v0 builds and changes Next.js apps by chat, with a paid seat per collaborator and hosting on Vercel. Siteshare gives clients a free editor on any host.

AI site builder

Siteshare vs Bolt

Bolt builds sites and apps by chat and hosts them on bolt.host. Siteshare gives the client a site is handed over to an editor of their own, on any host.

Hand it over. Get your evenings back.

Free for one site, forever. No card needed.